Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Fri 10/05/24 01:34:42 GMT |
Message # 8157.1.1 Subject: If you look closely.... Date: Wed 21/01/04 13:25:02 GMT Name: JJ Email: JJ.vintagewet.com Website: http://vintagewet.com/ |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
...she IS wearing seamed stockings, which would be normal dress-code for this time period. I think it was Candice Bergen who said:"A lady is not dressed without stockings, regardless of the weather". But I do agree with you, Sopping, when they are used as a blaitent display of exibitionism and much prefer a complete "every-day" outfit getting wet.
Thanks Tim & Sopping for your appreciation. JJ
|
In reply to Message (8157.1) Re: re vintage update I particularly like this one...
By Sopping - katakai@verizon.net Wed 21/01/04 06:27:09 GMT ....why? For the reasons that most of the posters here do not!
Namely, she is wearing a simple summer skirt and blouse. No fancy frippery. no makeup, no garters, no stockings, just the sort of outfit that if a girl would be likely to be wearting if she were walking along a stream on a summer day.
And when she wades out and gets wet, she looks really wet and soaking. I like the way the drenched skirt molds her body.
I like simple, clinging wet dresses, blouses and skirts. This outfit qualifies, as it did on "page 37" when she was wading with another girl.
This gal is my number one favorite in the wetfan offerings. S: |
In reply to Message (8157) re vintage update
By Tim uk - Wed 21/01/04 06:12:12 GMT Thanks to JJ for this weeks fantastic vintage updates, always look forward to wednesdays....
thanks JJ
BR Tim uk
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.027 seconds to generate ]