Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Wed 08/05/24 06:39:12 GMT |
Message # 10112.4.2.1 Subject: Re: Re: No!!! Date: Sun 09/05/04 08:41:24 GMT Name: Magician |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
I didn't read the original posts that seem to have generated this thread, however I would be very disappointed if all the gossip and links to webshots, etc disappeared. Surely, if the photos are already on the net then they are in the public domain so linking to them is valid. As for posting 'private' pictures of wives or girlfriends without their consent, then I would be against that, however that would be very difficult to prove one way or another. As for little stories about what you got up to at the weekend, then what is the harm. If they are not offensive or pornographic in nature, then surely this is no more damaging than chatting to someone at a bar? And should therefore be up to the individual concerned if they want to share their experiences. I do not see how public pictures and stories can ever replace or compete with pay sites that offer premium wetlook photos. They are worlds apart and , in my opinion can continue together. Magician |
In reply to Message (10112.4.2) Re: No!!!
By Graham (Styx) - graham@styxwetworld.com Sun 09/05/04 07:13:12 GMT Styx (Graham and Kev) are still reasonable people. Graham (that's me, not Styx) expressed an opinion about candid material - and that opinion was not liked and was therefore deleted along with other posts that were anything related to Styx or GrayHost. Pleasecontact us by email (via our website) if you wish to discuss anything with us. |
In reply to Message (10112.4) No!!!
By Ikarus - Sun 09/05/04 06:13:29 GMT The forum would loose sense. I mean, you can check the few paysites on the UMD or directly. It's webshots and othe finds that make this forum so very unique and they are probobly the reason, most people come here. Please don't do taht Nigel! Not everyone is rich enough to join paysites - by the way.
Anyway, what's up with Styx. Could you throw in a link or tell us, what they are saying and why? They seemed resonable people when I emailed with them once, what happened now?
Mike. |
In reply to Message (10112) Should I ban Webshots and other public links from the forum ?
By Nigel - nigel@wetlook.com Sun 09/05/04 05:33:02 GMT Website: www.wetlook.com As Sytx does not like candid/publicly shot material, then maybe we should ban all candid and public shot stuff from the forum?
That will mean that no images are allowed unless they were taken specifically with the womans knowledge that they would be seen on a 'fetish' website.
That will mean no webshots, no crosslinks to other, non-wetlook websites, no fountain pictures, no pictures from Thailand, or any other water festival
We will restrict what is posted here to just anouncements from wetlook producers, of their new material featuring paid for models.
You will not be allowed to even post stories, of some girl you saw getting wet on the beach, or in a fountain, and you will not be able to tell us what you did with your wife/girlfriend in the bath or pool over the weekend, without first sending me proof that she gives agreement to it being revealed to the world.
The same of course goes for all other links, we will only accept links if you can provide documentation that the models in the pictures were fully aware of the purpose of the pictures.
If you are happy with the above, then please continue to support Styx and their attacks on the public wetlook producers (note that they have never objected to the webshots links, only to people that are taking their paying customers away).
If you don't want this to come about, then stop calling for it.
Nigel
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.011 seconds to generate ]