Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Mon 13/05/24 09:02:58 GMT |
Message # 21926.6 Subject: Identify videos please Date: Fri 21/04/06 20:23:52 GMT Name: Anonymous |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Some of us are still so primitive that we're using dial-up. Please have mercy on us and indicate with an icon or in the subject line when you are linking to video. |
In reply to Message (21926) still photos or moving pictures? Preferances
By Arthur Chappell - arthur@chappell7300.freeserve.co.uk Fri 21/04/06 02:01:05 GMT Website: http://www.shvoong.com/www/personal-sites/170646-minx-wetlook-forum/ I wonder whether wetlook enthusiasts prefer still pictures and photos to moving film imagery? I do, strangely, though nothing can compensate for being close to wetlook girls or actually in the water with them. The moving picture tends to take away an image as quickly as it arrives, while a still photo has a preserved timeless frozen preserved quality. I quite like to see an image and imagine the moves by which the girl or gilrs captured in the shot got to where they are, and what the next move will be. A girl floating on her back in the water for example - will she turn to float/swim facing forward - Will she swim/wade towards camera, or away - will she lower her feet and start to stand up - will a girl dive deeper or begin to rise from the water? What effect will the water have on her clothes, cleavage, hair next? Etc... The moving image takes that mystery and imagination away too soon. Be interesting to see how others feel on this too. AC |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.021 seconds to generate ]