Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Sat 11/05/24 16:03:59 GMT |
Message # 27726.3.1 Subject: Re: you tube times Date: Wed 28/02/07 08:23:43 GMT Name: Rob |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
The actually do have higher quality videos? I'd say those crappy low-res/high-compression flash videos on youtube are always of the same bad quality, whether they have been taken with a cell phone or with a $2000 camcorder in the first place... |
In reply to Message (27726.3) Re: you tube times
By wetinwisc - cheesehead1965@hotmail.com Wed 28/02/07 05:57:13 GMT I agree, some of these YouTube videos take 3 times as long to download as the length of the video itself. I would think that the low-quality videos (such as those taken with a cell phone camera) would load quicker, while the highest-quality videos would take longer. What really pisses me off is when a video pauses every 2 seconds so that another 2 seconds of video can download. I'd rather wait for the whole video to download and watch it without interruption.
I can see, with some wetlook videos, why someone wouldn't want to use their best camera to record the action, as they don't want to ruin a $400 camcorder by dropping it in the water; thus the quality of some wetlook videos will be below average. |
In reply to Message (27726) you tube times
By darbtew - Tue 27/02/07 22:41:23 GMT anyone else experience long wait time with you tube? usually takes 15 min to watch 4 min video. anyone know what could be the problem? Thanks, Darbtew
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.005 seconds to generate ]