Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Tue 21/05/24 17:39:57 GMT |
Message # 37669.6.1.2 Subject: Re: Reply Date: Tue 21/10/08 03:11:11 GMT Name: MaK |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
It is not just the resolution. Most pictures of the Jen set have clearly visible color noise and some are slightly unsharp. They look as they were shot with a mobile phone and they simply lack the brilliance of for example the pictures from Wetlook-online (Tyra) and Wetfoto (Victor). Maybe your lighting is not good enough?
|
In reply to Message (37669.6.1) Reply
By Wet Kahuna - knightowlvideo@hotmail.com Mon 20/10/08 10:24:08 GMT Website: wetkahuna.com The first videos & pictures were taken in 1999 and posted in 2000. Many were still on dial-up. Speed, bandwidth, & equipment were not like today. The DVD's were much better quality. The 1st pic. posted here is 800x1142 -140k, orig is 2448x3264 - 5.43meg. Much better than the 30k - 50k earlier pictures, I thought this was good quality for today's free sets. I haven't done that much in the past few years, but the new videos are shot in HD (1080p). I haven't decided the final clip output yet to get reasonable quality/bandwidth.
|
In reply to Message (37669.6) Re: I'm back with new shoots
By MaK - Mon 20/10/08 06:17:51 GMT Nice to have you back, but why is the technical quality so low? Is this video caps?
Maybe you should consider a little better equipment if you want somebody to pay for this? Your pay-per-view videos have a very low resolution too and has previously disappointed me. 640x480 is not what you expect today from a pay site.
|
In reply to Message (37669) I'm back with new shoots
By Wet Kahuna - knightowlvideo@hotmail.com Sun 19/10/08 12:58:11 GMT Website: wetkahuna.com See More at http://wetkahuna.com/Jen.htm Videos to come soon
First set
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.026 seconds to generate ]