Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Mon 13/05/24 11:00:07 GMT |
Message # 40461.5 Subject: Re: intentional Wetlook prefered Date: Sat 13/06/09 00:54:46 GMT Name: the Hopeless case |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Hey Mr. E
I completely agree. There are all kinds of permutations of wetlook, all according to personal preference. But I would always prefer any situation that the lady has the "wammer gene", and has a personal craving to soak her clothes. (and or shoes/ socks/ stockings) There are relatively few produced scenes of quiet wetlook, where slashing, and fun is not invloved. Most wetlook scenes are more often about frolicking and splashing around.. that's more in fun. But I believe in real life, in private, their enjoyment is more often a more serene, sensitive experience. We do not see this produced very often. |
In reply to Message (40461) intentional Wetlook prefered
By Mr. E. - Fri 12/06/09 13:47:14 GMT Refering to an article a while back... I absolutely prefer intentional wetlook. I like the idea that a girls gets wet because she WANTS to get wet and she does it BECAUSE SHE ENJOYS IT. A girl falling in or getting pushed gives me absolutely nothing. I bought a couple of videos and saw the girls falling in or getting thrown in and I was so disappointed. I would never again buy a video in which the girls just get pushed in or fall, as they neither seem to want it nor seem to like it. I like the moment when a girl gets in slowly, deeper and deeper enjoying what she does. If wetlook is just an accident... well... it's just an accident... nothing more.
Are there any more feeling like me?
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.014 seconds to generate ]