Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Sat 21/09/24 02:05:30 GMT |
Message # 71013.1.1.2.1 Subject: Re:Google is your friend... Date: Sat 05/08/17 02:05:01 GMT Name: AnthonyX Email: anthonyx@jowc.net |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Thanks for the link. Well, my interest is more for the novelty than aesthetics... I think she's now fallen into the category "good looking from far, but far from good looking". |
In reply to Message (71013.1.1.2) Google is your friend...
By NotAnotherDave - Thu 03/08/17 14:15:22 GMT http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-4722618/Pamela-Anderson-flashes-nipple-wardrobe-malfunction.html
Doesn't do much for me but you may disagree |
In reply to Message (71013.1.1) Re:Pamela Anderson suit + water
By AnthonyX - anthonyx@jowc.net Thu 03/08/17 03:48:04 GMT Interesting.
Caption reads (in part): "Anderson wears a Stella McCartney jacket, $1,495, and pants, $835"...
$2,300 designer outfit and she swims in it. Must be nice to have that kind of money to throw around.
Such tiny pictures, can hardly see the outfit, almost more tease than the close-up I referenced in my question.
But still kinda neat - always fun to see business-y wear in situations like that, and still looks OK despite being obviously past her prime.
|
In reply to Message (71013.1) Re:Pamela Anderson suit + water
By Jake577 - Thu 03/08/17 02:02:01 GMT Scroll down a bit. ;) https://www.wmagazine.com/story/pamela-anderson-activism-feminism-interview |
In reply to Message (71013) Pamela Anderson suit + water
By AnthonyX - anthonyx@jowc.net Thu 03/08/17 00:09:54 GMT Happened upon this today:
https://peopledotcom.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/73840009_v3.jpg?w=3300&h=2661
Apparently, she was doing some modelling on the French Riviera recently.
Is this as close to wetlook (dry tease) as we get, or could there be more (and actually wet) images of her in suits n stuff?
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.011 seconds to generate ]