Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Mon 06/05/24 01:53:18 GMT |
Message # 18062 Subject: All of this blather about underaged models Date: Mon 05/09/05 04:29:24 GMT Name: Sopping Email: katakai1@verizon.net |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
I don't get it.
I am not talking about national laws here, just common sense. It is OK to take and publish a picture of an infant, a young child, a lovely young woman---of ANY age...As long as she is, playing in the park, petting a small dog, sucking on an ice-cream bar, or sitting on a fence wearing a bikini etc etc. - whatever. No problem, no porn, no nothing.No cries of alarm!
Why can said young lady be innocently wading in a lake? Is it OK for her to be standing by the lake then? Or possibly just getting her feet wet? At what point does she wade to sufficient depth that the button of the "anti-porn police" is pushed?
There is not the slightest element of porn in these pictures.You know it, I know it, we all know it.
But, on this site, we have postings by slobbering voyeurs of "Busty,Sexy teen-models" and similar porn-come-ons all the time. Big time! If I were to waste my time on these sites, I am sure I could identify some underage bimbos. But why bother.
S:
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.014 seconds to generate ]