Wetlook World Forum

Message # 31740.1.1.1.1

Subject: Re: wet vs. messy

Date: Wed 26/09/07 17:27:54 GMT

Name: bryce

Email: brycepunk1@earthlink.net

Website: http://brycepunk.grayhost.net/index-wam.html

By the lone taper - Wed 26/09/07 14:17:53 GMT

Website:

wetlook and messy are TOTALLY seperate -

I also agree that it is disrespectful to women to slam a pie in their face -

or have them roll around in mud or pour some goo over their head -

it is comedy and not sexually exciting -

women are to be honored & respected and not degraded -

buy hey to each their own -

this is a wetlook forum -

which i check in with often -

because it is WETLOOK -

and you are right we can agree to disagree -

like I don't get the Tarzan pics where women are in winter jackets -

but anything see thru and revealing -

i am a huge fan of

keep up the good work y'all -

i appreciate it!

peace

By Victor - victor-ivanovich1@yandex.ru Wed 26/09/07 07:46:21 GMT

Website:

As for me, I'm into wetlook, and only into jeans/trousers (though occasionally I can save a video or a pic with jeans shorts). But sometimes if I come across a good muddy pic or video I can save it. The same with women peeing in their jeans. But I have thousands of wet pics in my collection, and only a few dozen muddy and pissy pics. And I never save vids or pics with food staff.

As for buying DVDs or memberships, I wasn't a credid card holder, but now I am. So I'm considering buying wetlook stuff, but I don't think I'll pay for messy staff.

By Anonymous - Wed 26/09/07 05:07:55 GMT

Website:

This disussion can go further into the issue of pure wetlook fans preferring either skirts or jeans, gowns, underwater, shoes etc. In most cases a "wam" fan has their own personal preferences and I think that the producers do a great job of bringing a wide variety of material to the public, and I think we should appreciate their efforts to cator to individual tastes: for example the way Leonmoonin separates his material depending on its catagory: messy, wetlook, pants, public, etc.....

By shell-din - Wed 26/09/07 02:22:10 GMT

Website:

and i think it is worth talking about,

i am a wetlook fan,

i find it sexy and alluring,

the more see thru the better -

and I have no problem asking a woman to take a clothed shower with me.

i always found Messy to be more shtick,

with nothing sexy about it,

actually it seems pretty humilating and degrading for the woman involved.

And would never think of asking someone to roll around in some mud to turn me on.

What is sexy about a woman getting a pie in the face?

I completely agree with the original poster John,

then when people say WAM it does mean more messy than wet,

and it is frustrating.

i have bought VHS and DVDs from producers going back well over 15 years,

I initally came to the scene,

when I bought a SSS video thru Movies Unlimited,

i think #4,

and being so bummed at the wet vs. messy ratio,

for every wet scene there were 3 messy scenes,

and i did not want to pay for those.

Back then I had no choice, to get wet VHS tapes, I had to deal with it.

Thank god the times have changed.

Now Mark, (if you are here) please don't take it personal,

from my heart, I thank you for all you've done.

And I know the passion you do it with.

I view the WAMTEC search guide monthly when i get the TIVO schedule.

But the mud, it is just not my bag baby!

Just because I drink beer, does not mean I like all types.

If I buy Heineken, i don't expect a Pabst Blue Ribbon can in my 12 pack.

If I like wetlook, does not mean I enjoy messy.

Just one man's opinion, I look forward to yours.

thanks for reading.