Wetlook World Forum

Of course if we do differentiate them (which I hope to god we do so some other A**hole can't shove them in my face for sport), then we have to ask, do they belong here, or in some other forum that is actually for such material.  Since encouraging women to maintain this state of unhealth by giving them attention is essentially enabling a harmful condition, I don't believe it belongs here any more than encouraging kiddy porn.

Of course the next unanswerable question will be how to decide what is allowed?  Pretty hard to draw the line.  But I think we need to draw the line before some jacka** starts posting pictures of people with gross birth defects, serious burn victims, amputees, drowning victims and the like for shock value as long as they are wet.  I'm not dissing these poor people (although seriously overweight people did bring it on themselves, fat is only stored calories that had to enter through the mouth), but they are not photographic subjects.  Can we agree that this is at least an average people's forum, and not a forum for people well beyond the norm?  I really don't mean glamour babes only, but if someone is at the point their doctor should be suggesting they staple their stomach, we shouldn't be encouraging them to continue.

Oh, I'm not Wet Guy, I hijacked the name temporarily because I am an entrepreneurial type, and sick and tired of political correctness that only encourages lack of performance, and ethics.  Somebody needs to call bad taste what it is.  I am not afraid to say that people that are overweight to the point of being a health risk shouldn't be the subject of glamour photography, and nobody should be slipping such pictures into a mainstream forum without warning at least.  Some of this SC stuff is downright deviant.  If that makes me an asshole, so be it.  I'm proud to have the cajones to stand up for some level of content quality.