Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Tue 30/04/24 23:14:09 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 50462.4

Subject: Re:A personal editorial on wetlook

Date: Sun 29/05/11 21:18:51 GMT

Name: Doug Dress2Splash

Email: dress2splash@hotmail.com

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

Here, too, are personal opinions and tastes, and not concrete facts to be taken as any "Final Word" on what is and what is not good wetlook. I probably fall into a category similar to Anthony. Back when I maintained a wetlook group on the now-defunct "MSN Groups", Anthony's "Joys Of Wet Clothing" was my main inspiration for how I wanted my group to look. But that's gone now, along with all MSN Groups. Now, I have MySpace and Facebook.

I discovered what we now call "Wetlook" on TV ads and shows and movies shown on TV. plus a few rare wetlook scenes in movies seen in theaters, all back during the 1960s. Specifically, I first remember being sexually aroused by thoughts of wet women in clothes in the Fall of '66. I was 14 then.

Puberty is the most powerful time in a person's life to be turned on by wetlook [or anything else] for the very first time, and that's right where Wetlook first hit me -- at the peak of puberty!

I, too, am most turned on my wet women who are the most dressed up. Why? Partly because that's what people LEAST expect to see somebody get wet in. Also, partly because, while formal clothes or business clothes can cover up most of the lady, those clothes are usually light weigh enough to show color change and cling when wet. The dressier the clothes, the greater the sexy impact upon seeing a dressed lady hit the water!

If the clothes do not change their appearance when getting wet, there is little or nothing for me to get excited about. That's why most leather clothes mean nothing to me where wetlook is concerned. If the lady wearing them happens to look better emerging from the water with her hair all wet, that helps.

I never knew the word "Wetlook"applied to women in wet clothes [and wet hair] until I discovered it on the Internet in about 1999 or 2000. I remember typing in the words "Wet Girls" into the old browser, and the first hing I was was a site called "Wet On The 'Net" which was mostly out-of-focus candid pictures of women and girls in various wet situations.

The first two wetlook websites I found were "Wet Kahuna's Splashin'-In-Fashion" and Anthony's "Joys Of Wet Clothing". Both these sites are still online today as we speak. Like a young teen's first discovery of the sexuality of wetlook at the peak of puberty, my first Internet Wetlook discoveries are among the strongest for me. Having said that, I've seen many others since then that offer a lot of great stuff, from jeans to dresses to wedding gowns to business suits, all of them very beautiful.

Kahuna's video of Emmy Lou in the lacy wet dress in the first video remains a top wetlook favorite of mine to this day.

Anthony's "Lessons - Part 4" likewise tops my list of favorite wetlook stories. That story, for me, perfectly covers why some of us find dresses to be sexier [literally!] in wetlook than any other clothing. [A dress or a woman's business suit with a dress skirt tends to accommodate in-the-water lovemaking much more readily than pants on a woman can,...]

I have my dressy favorites in wetlook, but I can also be excited by a lady in wet jeans [or trousers] and shirts. The woman's reaction to getting wet is what makes or breaks the scene for me. If she is happy in the water, with her pretty hair and dress soaked through, as long as she can smile and enjoy the water, then it's all worthwhile.

I started getting wet in public myself, hoping it would eventually draw out women to feel comfortable in getting wet [swimming in water theme parks or lakes, or playing in public fountains]. What I instead found was that I loved the sensation of getting wet, and the joyful reaction of women swimmers and lifeguards to my doing it, had me becoming the wetlook I had wanted to see. My target audience is still women who like to get wet themselves, including those who have willingly modeled it online. I'd be tickled "Six ways from Sunday" to find a female wetlook model happy to see me get wet in a dress suit. I know -- That's a fantasy that will most likely never be realized, but a man can dream, can't he?

I've had some dialogue with one or two wet women online, and it's always wonderful for me to hear and learn more about wet women's point of view on wetlook.

I don't eat/sleep/ drink/breathe/live wetlook 24/7. I have a pretty full life outside of all this.

Sometimes, I get a little saturated looking at wetlook after all these years, but I still have my "WOW!" moments now and then, and it can come from a variety of sources. LagoonLover's YouTube videos, new this year, are a great new favorite. Here is a GORGEOUS curvy woman who thoroughly enjoys diving fully dressed into the water.

As long as the water dramatically changes the appearance of the clothes and the woman's hair, and the wet woman is in happy circumstances, and is smiling and richly enjoying being seen wet by the whole world online, then Wetlook admirers, I think, are well served.

In reply to Message (50462)

A personal editorial on wetlook

By AnthonyX - anthonyx@jowc.net Sun 29/05/11 12:21:29 GMT

Website:

If you're reading this, I don't expect you to agree with me, nor do I intend to influence your views, merely to present my personal view at this point in time. So, if you don't like what I'm about to say, you know where the "back" button is...

I've been following wetlook on the internet since about 1995, which now adds up to more than a decade and a half, and I've had a personal "interest" for as long as I can remember. Over all that time, my tastes and specific interests have evolved, and I've seen a wide variety of wetlook. From casual to formally attired, totally un-sexy outfits to all-out sexually provocative, from barely dressed to multiple layers with barely an inch of skin visible, from scripted film scenes to glamour to spontaneous dunkings to accidents, and from thoroughly enjoyed by the subject to thoroughly disliked, and scenes/situations which are somewhat unique to scenes/situations which tend to occur frequently. In all that I've seen, I've come to find that there are certain elements which make up an enjoyable and/or erotic wetlook scenario, and some which just don't register for me.

I've occasionally encountered some jeans-and-t-shirt scenes/pictures which make nice wetlook, but that's almost always because the subject is wearing a thin, tight t-shirt without a bra and you can clearly see her nipples and the contours of her breasts. I'm pretty sure the appeal has to do with the woman effectively exposing herself (as if the shirt isn't there), but she is technically clothed, and that the wet shirt is sublty enhancing her figure. Since casual clothes seem to be a frequent option for impromptu swimwear, it often leads me to find more appeal in outfits which are more formal. Business wear for me comes out as a favourite because of the incongruity when the wearer gets wet. All-out formal (like evening gowns) don't really do so much for me because a lot of formal wear is about exposing skin - bare arms, shoulders, short skirts, etc. generally mean there's less clothing involved, and it just ain't wetlook if there aren't clothes getting wet.

This leads me to the matter of "coverage". Summer casual is frequently shorts and tank top, which to me is about the same as a swimsuit... not all that interesting as wetlook. Conversely, heavy winter coats, with hats, mittens, and boots, seem to take things too far the other way. It's nice to see a woman's shape, and all bundled up for blizzard hides pretty much everything. Those latex body suits, although form-fitting, and somehow interesting on some level, also seem to go a little too far for my liking. That leaves blouses, skirts and dresses, which are generally on the modest side, but dressy... hence my focus on business attire.

For me, sexy-when-dry outfits don't always make for good wetlook. Sometimes, they don't look any different when wet. Sometimes there just isn't enough there. Perhaps also, it's a matter of how much the wetlook adds to a turn-on. A sexy outfit is already a turn-on; getting it wet for the sake of "turn-on" factor is somewhat redundant. On the other hand, a non-sexy outfit owes everything to the wetlook factor when it gets wet.

The situation is also an important factor. Scripted scenes can be quite interesting from a wetlook point of view, but can also be non-starters. If the subject is in jeopardy, it seems to take away from the appeal of a scene for it's wetlook content; likewise, if the subject dislikes the situation, it's difficult not to empathize with the character. The same goes for accidents and impromptu dunkings... if the subject ends up enjoying their situation, despite it being unintended, it can be enjoyable to watch, but otherwise, it's difficult to enjoy a scene where the subject (character, actress, or self) just wants to be somewhere else. That's why I often enjoy glamour scenes; the subject is most likely enjoying the scene (at least not disliking it), although they can get predictable. Also, the more unique a scene is, the more interesting it can be.

All this leads me to a (perhaps inconsistent) personal "profile" of those scenes I currently enjoy versus those I don't. Those scenes of impromptu pool jumps at weddings are nice to watch, although it depends a lot on what the wedding party is wearing: more bare skin = less interesting wetlook. Those ads (TV and internet) built around the catchphrase "girls look hot wet, guys don't" hit most of the marks as I've discussed. Wet t-shirt contests are for me almost always non-starters... planned soaking of casually attired subjects, and there are a LOT of them. There are some classic movie moments which may be funny, may "count" as wetlook, but do nothing for me (e.g. Lucy and Ethel in a shower), and some moments from not-so-classic movies like John Derek's version of Tarzan, or a certain episode of "Tremors" which for me contain good helpings of great wetlook.

As I said, this is all just a personal view.

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)