Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Tue 07/05/24 16:46:37 GMT |
Message # 55534.5 Subject: Re:off topic: what pantyhose is best for wetlook? ultra sheer or opaque? Date: Sat 08/09/12 16:12:38 GMT Name: Roscoe_BC |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Personally, I don't like opaque. I want to see legs, not fabric. What I like best is stockings, with the tops showing here and there so I can tell they are there even if they are totally sheer, but I like them better with a little color to them. |
In reply to Message (55534) off topic: what pantyhose is best for wetlook? ultra sheer or opaque?
By Jessica - friends@fantasystockings.com Fri 07/09/12 07:33:53 GMT Website: http://fantasystockings.com// www.fantasystockings.com I just interviewed a person (crossdresser) on wearing ultra-sheer hosiery, like 8 den or so. She loves it because she says that she dares people to notice if she is even wearing it. http://fantasystockings.com/crossdresser-nicole-in-ultra-sheer-pantyhose/
This got me thinking about wetlook. If I wear ultra-sheer and it gets wet, it will become completely invisible. At least that's what happens if I wear some kind of light coloured pantyhose. So is that considered sexy or not if you can't even notice that a woman is wearing pantyhose when she is enjoying wetlook?
I would like to hear your opinion. Would you rather go for opaque pantyhose that will be noticed or would that excite you to watch ultra sheer pantyhose "disappear" when wet?
Jessica http://fantasystockings.com/ / www.fantasystockings.com http://fantasywetlook.com/ / www.fantasywetlook.com |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.021 seconds to generate ]