Wetlook World Forum

This is an old argument, but let's have another kick at it...

Men and women have certain differences in approach to things and in communication style (among many other things).

We tend to be more visual in that it's more often the man looking at erotic pictures, watching erotic/pornographic video than women.

But, women are essentially THE consumers of all those Harlequin romances, etc. which are, in a manner of speaking, porn for the female mind.

When it comes to a fetish like wetlook, if a woman gets turned on by wetlook, it's almost certainly because of how it feels... never mind what her guy is doing. All she has to do is fish some interesting outfit out of her closet and hop in the bath. Does she feel weird doing it? Does she need validation from other women that she is not alone/not weird? I don't know, but I'll guess the answer is either "what difference does it make what I do in private" or "that's what I have friends for". Women seem to be able to talk more openly amongst themselves than men do. Add it all up and there isn't the need for women to go surfing the internet in relation to wetlook

On ther other hand, most men need visual stimulation; if there is no girlfriend or wife to satisfy them, they/we seek out pictures and videos of women doing what turns him/us on (wetlook, in our case). Do we think we're alone or weird? Well, those questions are what initially brought me to the usenet groups and ultimately the web. Not to mention the resource it has become for wetlook content.

Do the women who model wetlook get turned on by it? At least a few do, but none have to - they're either getting paid or finding some other reward (maybe she' an exhibitionist, or she's into the clothes she's modelling).

Put all this together and it says that gender representation in this forum says nothing about how frequently the fetish actually occurs in women vs men... if you want an accurate answer, you have to step away from the computer, go out into the real world and do a scientifically and statistically valid formal study - free from any possible form of sampling bias.

So, maybe the "confession of a female" was written by a man, but there is nothing tangible to discount it as an authentic female perspective. In the absence of anything to discredit it, I'll take it for what it purports to be.