minx

Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Thu 02/05/24 12:22:11 GMT

Translate page FROM gb -> TO de fr it nl es pt jp

Translate page TO gb <- FROM de fr it nl es pt jp

WetlookPro

Message # 58223.1.1.1.1

Subject: None Re:Hmm, cynic me...

Date: Thu 20/06/13 05:18:58 GMT

Name: MK us

Email: wamtec@comcast.net

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: Make Donation (you can change amount)

Previous Reply
Next New Message
Active List Archive

First off....I know who wrote that article and those models....and these are David Willey's Artscene wetlook models and David wrote the article. This is just a fantasy article, so enjoy it it for what it us....an interesting article written by legendary wetlook producer David Wilkey of Artscene productions who comes from "Bath" (I kid you not) in the UK. I do not know how old the article is, but those pics are over 20 years old, cos the girl on the left in the light blue dress is UK model Vicky Ford....and I did lots of shoots with Vicky in 1997 and 1998 when she visited Florida and later she went to Thailand with Nigel and I in 1998 to be our wetlook water girl when we attended Songkran in 1998. She's a great girl....very easy to work with and always puts in a great performance.....but as with all the other wetlook models I have worked with over the last 24 years, wetlook is "just a modelling job" for Vicky and other wetlook models. They enjoy the work and have fun doing the scenes but they do not go to bed at night dreaming about wet clothing.... as we do.

 

Secondly, Steven nailed it when he said what I have said many times in recent years on this forum....i.e.

 

"I often wonder how Leon views wetlook now compared to when he started, or MK (or Erik or any of the mainstream producers). Like a chef whose asked to cook when he gets home? You can have too much of a good thing? "

 

Very true.....if you spend 24 years cooking for yourself in your own kitchen.....as I have done....pretty soon you become less interested in your own cooking...and you prefer to taste what other people are cookling instead. You become less interested in self indulgence and trying to please yourself, cos there are only so many ways to get a model wet and only so many kinds of outfits to use....so you soon get bored with staging things and controling the outcome yourself.....cos hiring models and directing them as per your own ideas, is a bit like gambling in a casino where you know what the outcome will be...cos you are controlling the black jack table and the roulette wheel. So...in my case I started out shooting my own fantasies.....but after about 5 years of that I have done everything I could think of........so I was like a dog chasing a car.....i.e. once I caught the car.....then I could not figure out what to do with it....ha ha. So I then began to grow more interested in what other wetlook producers were doing instead of anything I was directing.

 

Thirdly, the last subject that Frank raises.......is there such a creature on this earth as the self indulgent non commercial non appeasing heterosexual female wetloooker.......a female who is engaging in wetlook activities purely for her own indulgent reasons....and not for any other motives......which is what most male wetlook fans do......cos this would make for a great reality tv series....cos they have lots of reality shows that go in search of Bigfoot and the Loch Ness monster....and DIscovery Channel recently did a fun mockumentary about whether real Mermaids exists. Real wetlook females would rank right up thjere with Unicorns and the Tooth Fairy. I have been chatting with wetlook fans online since the Compuserve email days of 1988...and chatting with hundreds of models I have worked witth over the last 24 years, and have encountered lots of females and their views on wetlook, and here are my historical stats on females in the the wetlook world.....95% of the women I have encountered as models or wives of friends or customers fall into one of 3 categories

 

1) The Entrepreneurs, who work as models in the wetlook industty, or have their own websites, so their motives are purely commercial. These are great girls who always work very hard to put in good performances....but this is just "a job" and a great service they provide to the wetlook community. Wetlook to them is just like Horse Racing.....i.e. would anybody be interested in showing up at a horse race if they did not have any money or gambling allowed.....likewise....wetlook models and female website owners would lose all their interest if there was not a financial reason to attend those shoots.

 

2) The Appeasers or Accommodaters...i.e. these are the wives and girlfriends of wetlook fans....who are very tolerant and accommodate their man's interests and will do whatever they can to push his buttons and get him in the mood for sex. Wetlook is used as sexual foreplay. This is how my wife has been for 32 years with me....i.e. wetlook means nothing to her personally....but she knows I like it and she has always been very tolerant of my wetlook "hobbies".

 

3) The Abstainers.......I have encountered quite a few wives and girlfrends over the years....who would order my wetlook products merely as "gifts" for their hubby or boyfriend....cos they know hubby likes it....and they admit to me that they hate it........and I remember one lady paid me a back-handed compliment one time after she was ordering my wetlook media for her hubby.....and she said...."your media is really a blessing......cos I can just order this stuff from you to keep my hubby happy.....and then I do not have to do this wetlook crap for him myself any more"...ha ha.....

 

Thats the 99% of the females I have encountered over the last 24 years.....i.e. if you take away the money aspect and the husband or boyfriend aspect....I have never met any female that has ever wanted to do wetlook scenes on her own without money or a boyfriend being her motivations.

 

Now.....there are some rare exceptions I have encountered....but those were not heterosexual females....cos some lesbians and transgender people I encountered who were self indulgment wetlookers...but those folks were crossdressers or transgender people who were born male and had had a sex change operation to become a female, and some lesbian couples I met liked wetlook too. But a self indulgent heterosexual female wetlooker who is not motivated by commercial reasons or a husband or boyfriend......thats a "Unicorn" to me.

 

I am not saying that such a creature does not exist today.....cos we do know of one that once existed ....i.e. Wetmar..... she was really great and was totally into the subject matter for her own personal self indulgent reasons. I never met Wetmar but Graham and other producers have all said she was "the real deal"...but sadly she went the same way as the Tasmanian Tiger and became extinct.

 

I am not trying to pour cold water on this subject or bum people out, I am merely trying to point out that you will be wasting your time and money if you register at a dating website and think you can find some women who share the same passion for wetlook as you do. The best you can do in life is to find a very tolerant and accommodating partner. Women do have some fetish interests.....especially in the Bondage and S&M arena....but wetlook is not one of the fetishes that turn women on.

 

Women may get turned on at the site of Brad Pitt or David Beckham in a wet shirt.....but it is not the wet shirt that turns them on....it is who is wearing that shirt and whether they have 6 pack abs. The wet shirt means nothing to them.

 

Male wetlook fans can look at Bo Derek in a wet shirt or see thru dress and appreciate the wet garments....and they would "tune out" once Bo Derek took off her wet clothes and was naked.

 

Women would rather see David Beckham or Brad Pitt rip off their wet shirt asap and show their abs.

 

MK

 

 

 

 

In reply to Message (58223.1.1.1) None Re:Hmm, cynic me...

By Frank Lampard...Stevie G's oppo - ex Wed 19/06/13 21:17:54 GMT

Website:


Hmm, it would be fascinating to see such a study. Of what % of fetishes are made up of those in to wetlook, broken down in to how many are female. By that I mean finding it an actual sexual turn on. I'm quite sceptical that it even exists in women, but as you say have no evidence to collaborate.

 

In a mild "why are we here on earth" way I have always wondered why or how I ended up it being my thing. I've always been quite open to girl mates, girlfriends, wife about it and never heard any other response than surprise or "that's a new one on me". Which to me is a good thing. :-)

In reply to Message (58223.1.1) None Re:Hmm, cynic me...

By AnthonyX - anthonyx@jowc.net ca Wed 19/06/13 20:43:33 GMT

Website:


I would agree that you shouldn't believe anything you read without some form of corroboration... some degree of skepticism/cynicism is a good thing.

 

This is an old argument, but let's have another kick at it...

 

Men and women have certain differences in approach to things and in communication style (among many other things).

 

We tend to be more visual in that it's more often the man looking at erotic pictures, watching erotic/pornographic video than women.

 

But, women are essentially THE consumers of all those Harlequin romances, etc. which are, in a manner of speaking, porn for the female mind.

 

When it comes to a fetish like wetlook, if a woman gets turned on by wetlook, it's almost certainly because of how it feels... never mind what her guy is doing. All she has to do is fish some interesting outfit out of her closet and hop in the bath. Does she feel weird doing it? Does she need validation from other women that she is not alone/not weird? I don't know, but I'll guess the answer is either "what difference does it make what I do in private" or "that's what I have friends for". Women seem to be able to talk more openly amongst themselves than men do. Add it all up and there isn't the need for women to go surfing the internet in relation to wetlook

 

On ther other hand, most men need visual stimulation; if there is no girlfriend or wife to satisfy them, they/we seek out pictures and videos of women doing what turns him/us on (wetlook, in our case). Do we think we're alone or weird? Well, those questions are what initially brought me to the usenet groups and ultimately the web. Not to mention the resource it has become for wetlook content.

 

Do the women who model wetlook get turned on by it? At least a few do, but none have to - they're either getting paid or finding some other reward (maybe she' an exhibitionist, or she's into the clothes she's modelling).

 

Put all this together and it says that gender representation in this forum says nothing about how frequently the fetish actually occurs in women vs men... if you want an accurate answer, you have to step away from the computer, go out into the real world and do a scientifically and statistically valid formal study - free from any possible form of sampling bias.

 

So, maybe the "confession of a female" was written by a man, but there is nothing tangible to discount it as an authentic female perspective. In the absence of anything to discredit it, I'll take it for what it purports to be.

 

In reply to Message (58223.1) None Hmm, cynic me...

By Steven Gerrard - ex Wed 19/06/13 19:33:49 GMT

Website:


Call me the cynic but I think that confession of a female is written by a male wetlooker.

 

I wonder if wetlook as a fetish is a sole male domain, I think it might be. Don't get me wrong, I know there are women out there who don't mind/care about getting wet as fun or when drunk and enough who will get wet to please their guy but an actual fetish of their's? I'm not so sure. Would be interesting to find out the ratio's. The lack of female genuine online wetlookers makes me wonder.

 

When I first told my wife about my fetish she couldn't stop laughing, ok ok it IS quite funny, and she admitted to me she thought my fetish might be something harmful like swinging, rough sex, anal or BDSM (bit harsh?) but at the end of the day it's just fun to her and a treat for me to be played at 2-3 times a year. I can handle that.

 

I am not sure I could handle a female wetlook fetisher. It would kind of ruin it, because for me the buzz is thats it's not mainstream, it's not regular, it's a special occasion and mainly it's not what the female wants to mess up her hair or clothes. My buzz is her coming home in her suit and getting wet because it could wreck the suit or dress, not a shorts and t-shirt on the beach.

 

I often wonder how Leon views wetlook now compared to when he started, or MK (or Erik or any of the mainstream producers). Like a chef whose asked to cook when he gets home? You can have too much of a good thing? The taboo of it makes it for me.

In reply to Message (58223) Info Some more interesting perspectives on wetlook

By AnthonyX - anthonyx@jowc.net ca Wed 19/06/13 18:43:59 GMT

Website:


Found this article while randomly surfing for things pertaining to wetlook:

 

http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/shm/water.html

 

If only there was a nicely dressed woman and a swimming pool nearby...


Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: Make Donation (you can change amount)

All WAM Drunk Sex Orgy Clips4Sale
Wetlook-Online

Minx Movies - M12 - Dressed in Wet is now in the Download Store
Download Store

Minx Movies - M15 - Wet Me Now is now in the Download Store
Download Store

Minx Movies - M14 - Get Wet With Me is now in the Download Store
2ipmd65.jpg2ipmdg2.jpgckfbj77.jpgjapgs25.jpgzgjbt99.jpg Download Store 2fpbs94.jpgkijws74.jpgrlsps97.jpglasbjg7.jpg2fptg96.jpg2gpdde7.jpg


Minx Movies - M8 - Mask Of Wetness is now in the Download Store
Download Store



[ This page took 0.027 seconds to generate ]