Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Mon 13/05/24 09:09:24 GMT |
Message # 75799.1.1 Subject: Re:Great find, Silas Date: Tue 08/01/19 23:35:16 GMT Name: Poliut |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Every once in a while it'll come along briefly as part of some mainstream trend under a new name before fading back into obscurity under this name. |
In reply to Message (75799.1) Great find, Silas
By jollywetfellow - Tue 08/01/19 23:16:29 GMT Fantastic to have a mainstream (is that the word? - anyway one that is not specifically about what we call wetlook) publication treating the wet clothes fetish seriously, even sympathetically. Further increasing the chances of me being believed when I say I'm not interested in the kiddies when I take photos of wet women on the beach! And maybe, too, we will find that many more people share a wetlook fetish than we (and especially MK!) tend to think.
Btw, personally I would be quite happy if the term 'wetlook' were dropped everywhere. It originally meant clothes that are designed to look wet but aren't (which was fashionable in the swinging sixties, and I notice is still popular amongst latin women - along with actually getting their clothes wet!). I have always assumed that some early member of the 'wetlook' community saw the opportunity for a pun, and it stuck; now, I get the impression that many 'wetlookers' don't even know that the word has two meanings. Though what else we might call ourselves instead I'm not so sure. |
In reply to Message (75799) Cool article about wetlook, not calling it wetlook
By Silas - Tue 08/01/19 21:30:58 GMT https://www.frolicme.com/readers-sex-stories/do-you-share-a-kink-for-women-in-wet-clothing/ |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.027 seconds to generate ]