Wetlook World Forum

First of all, I don't think anyone here has an appreciation of wetlook absent of any sexuality. At the one end it is subtly implied, along the spectrum there is erotically revealing, somewhere else on the spectrum is wet clothes as a premise for stripping, and at the extreme is explicit sex in a wetlook context.

Different strokes for different folks... we all have our own preferences on the intersection of wetlook and sexuality, just as we have our own tastes in clothing, models, situations, etc. Producers have their preferences for who and what they want to shoot, and if it finds an audience, good on them.

Consider "Game of Thrones" and its explicitness of sex and sexual themes including rape, incest, and homosexuality, along with both male and female full-frontal nudity - and on a wildly popular, mainstream TV show (albeit cable, not public broadcast). Just think for a moment how much our social attitudes have changed that we take such a thing in stride, where not long ago, it would have incited public uproar and/or invoked censorship.

Personally, I'd rather not see some of Ariel's most explicit male on female stuff, but that's just me.

And, as long as nothing she posts in-line violates the forum rules, I see nothing to complain about; you don't have to follow the links.