Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Sat 11/05/24 16:03:21 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 77952.4.1

Subject: Re:Pantyhose or no pantyhose

Date: Mon 29/07/19 18:30:08 GMT

Name: Earl

Email: jodler@online.no

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

I couldnt agree more Mark. The common you can see everywhere, its the rare people are willing to pay for. Its true, today young women rarely use pantyhose, but a lot of us men, also young men, enjoy watching women in pantyhose. Bare legs and a skirt you can see on a rainy day yourself, but try comming across a wet woman wearing pantyhose? If you do, dont be surprised if she is riding a unicorn.

Keep up the fantastic work Flaviu, with feeding us rare and beautiful wetlook. There are more and more wetlooksites coming up that doesnt have pantyhose in them at all, why ruin one of the last, really good ones? It has allways been good latin to let the producer decide, and dont cry about it, lets keep it that way, dont be bullied around Flaviu. You obviously like pantyhose yourself, keep it up, we love it! The ones that dont have plenty of options, without trying to force you to strip the pantyhose off your models. Since its so rear to see beautiful young women in pantyhose today, its very exiting to see it. Wetlooker had a survey over which sets he sold the most of last year, and a lot of them included pantyhose. As a resault, he now is producing a lot more pantyhose-wetlook than earlier.

Your work is fantastic Flaviu, dont let some cry-babier make you think otherwise. Its great to listen to your audience, but we are here for a reason. We absolutely love what you do, exactly the way it is. If someone think otherwise, they have plenty of options elsewhere.

In reply to Message (77952.4)

Re:Pantyhose or no pantyhose

By MK - wamtec@comcast.net Mon 29/07/19 16:23:51 GMT

Website:

It's a great question, but this really goes far beyond pantyhose, and goes a lot deeper to question what is the real source or core of your fetish interest.

The core question really is

"what is the core basis of your fetish interest - is it

a) you want to see things you can commonly see in every day life situations, or

b) you prefer to see uncommon things that you would rarely see in real life.

I can only speak for myself, and I fall into category b) because if I were a category a) person then I would prefer to see women wearing bathing suits getting wet, instead of clothes.

I live in Florida where you hardly ever see ladies wearing pantyhose, unless they work in an air conditioned office, so the rare and unusual aspect is what I like. If I wanted to see bare legged women then there would be no need to visit this forum, because I can see that every day by going to the beach or for a walk or bike ride at the park. This forum exists because there are 7 billion people on this planet, but only 35,000 people on this planet who are interested in wetlook, so folks come here in order to find the rare stuff that is hard to find on your own (well, it used to be hard to find before Youtube was created in 2005 and started spoonfeeding people).

In reply to Message (77952)

Pantyhose or no pantyhose

By EuroWAM TEAM - webmaster@eurowam.net Mon 29/07/19 10:02:33 GMT

Website: https://eurowam.net// www.eurowam.net

Hi guys,

I think some valid points have been made as reply to my other forum post and maybe indeed eurowam.net is a bit out of fashion using pantyhose in each session.

MAYBE not.

The only way I will know for sure it will be if I open a simple google poll and ask you guys what you think about it

The poll is here,

https://forms.gle/xRwsBp92cHjjhMNP7

it take you 3 seconds to give an answer and we do not collect ANY personal data.

Thank you for your time.

Flav

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)